For most Americans today, that principle is expressed most directly at the ballot box. But the right to vote, and the ability of communities to translate votes into meaningful representation, has never been guaranteed without struggle.

The promise outlined by Thomas Jefferson in 1776 took generations to broaden. It required war, constitutional amendments, civil rights organizing and continuing public pressure to extend voting rights beyond the narrow group originally allowed to participate. Women, communities of color and immigrants have long understood that political rights were not freely handed down; they were won, protected and, at times, reclaimed.

That history matters now because voting rights are facing new threats. In Washington, proposals continue to move forward that could make voting more difficult. The U.S. Supreme Court is also weighing questions that could affect how ballots are submitted and counted. In April, the court dealt a serious setback to the federal Voting Rights Act, weakening protections that have been especially important for Latino and Black voters.

California is not immune from these debates. A proposed proof-of-citizenship voting requirement has qualified for the November ballot, placing the state in the middle of a national fight over access to elections.

California’s own history shows why vigilance is necessary. For decades, women were barred from voting, Chinese immigrants were excluded from full civic participation, and the state used poll taxes and English literacy requirements to keep many residents of color from the ballot box.

The state has also made major progress. California is widely viewed as a leader in expanding voter access, and more women and people of color now serve in public office than in previous generations.

A major part of that progress came through the California Voting Rights Act. Over the past 20 years, the law has pushed more than 600 local governments away from at-large elections and toward district-based systems intended to better reflect the communities they serve.

Civil rights attorney Joaquin Avila, who helped shape the law, argued that voting rights must be measured not only by whether people can cast ballots, but also by whether communities have a fair chance to elect candidates who represent them. The state law helped increase Latino political participation and representation, leading in many places to government decisions more closely aligned with the needs of working families.

Still, the California Voting Rights Act does not address every problem. It does not stop discriminatory district maps before they are adopted. In some jurisdictions, voting lines can still be drawn in ways that weaken the influence of Latino communities. With federal protections diminished, California can no longer assume Washington will provide a reliable safeguard.

Advocates are now calling for the state to strengthen and update its voting rights laws. The California Democracy Partnership, a coalition focused on election protections, is seeking changes that would expand language access for voters, prevent discriminatory election changes before they take effect and give residents stronger tools to challenge maps that dilute their political voice.

California once helped lead the country in voting rights policy, and other states have since adopted protections that go further in some areas. At a time when confidence in democratic institutions is under strain, supporters argue the state has a responsibility to act again.

The idea of government by the people does not sustain itself automatically. It depends on each generation choosing to protect and expand participation. Strengthening California’s voting rights laws would be one way to honor the country’s founding promise and help ensure that all communities have a meaningful voice in their government.

Original source: CalMatters

The post California Must Act to Safeguard Voting Rights as Nation Nears 250 Years appeared first on The Hemet & San Jacinto Chronicle.