Every year, Sacramento and city halls across California find new ways to squeeze more money out of taxpayers. Property taxes creep up, sales taxes increase, and new local levies are dreamed up—often in the name of “equity” initiatives or DEI programs that rarely deliver real value for the vast majority of working Californians. While bureaucrats expand their pet projects, middle-class families are left footing the bill.

Now, with budget negotiations heating up in Washington, there is a renewed push by some California lawmakers to raise the SALT deduction cap, so wealthy taxpayers can write off even more of their ever-increasing local tax bills. This isn’t a solution; it’s a band-aid that hides the root problem—our state’s addiction to overspending and ever-bigger government.

Let’s be clear: increasing the SALT cap is a handout to local politicians who refuse to say “no” to new spending. It allows them to keep raising taxes and expanding programs, knowing that federal taxpayers in other states will absorb part of the pain. That is not fiscal responsibility. That is not fairness. And it’s not how America should work.

If we want real change, it’s up to Californians to push back. We must demand that our elected officials get serious about cutting wasteful spending and focus on core services like public safety, infrastructure, and education. We need to stop rewarding politicians who promise everything to everyone, then send us the bill. And if they won’t listen, it’s time to vote them out and elect leaders who understand that government should live within its means—just like the rest of us do.

The answer isn’t to shift the burden to taxpayers in Texas, Florida, or Ohio. The answer is to fix what’s broken in our own backyard. Congress must pass a budget bill without SALT increases, and Californians must demand real fiscal responsibility from our local and state leaders. Enough is enough.

The post Congress Must Pass a Budget Bill—Without SALT Increases. Californians Need to Demand Fiscal Responsibility at Home appeared first on The Hemet & San Jacinto Chronicle.

It will take at least a year to transition to a tidier government because meeting notification requirements, amending and canceling contracts, working with unions and RIF requirements, planning to consolidate infrastructure, and disposing of excess property will all take time.

The annual federal budget sets the priorities, size, functions, and cost of the government for the fiscal year. Agencies have a deadline to submit their budget proposal to the White House. The White House proposal then goes to the House for consideration. Individual members propose hundreds of amendments, mostly to meet campaign promises to their constituencies. After passage through Congress, the budget is signed into law.

The government is huge and very costly, but it serves a few mandated purposes. Let’s review:

Congress’s specific tasks to enact laws to accomplish the above are enumerated in the Constitution in Article 1, Section 8. They boil down to managing the government’s money and commerce, establishing courts, defining crimes and punishing violations, defending the nation, establishing the Post Office and roads, granting patents and copyrights, and overseeing the District of Columbia and federal facilities.

Inherently governmental activities are defined in law at 48 CFR § 7.503(c) and expand on the above tasks. They include conducting criminal investigations and prosecutions; commanding military forces; conducting foreign relations; determining agency policy, regulations, and program priorities for budget requests; managing federal employees; controlling intelligence operations; procuring goods and services for federal use, managing contracts, and disposing of property; approving agency responses to Freedom of Information Act requests; approving federal licensing actions and inspections; and responding to federal audits.

Basically, the overall work of the Departments of the Treasury, Defense, State, Commerce, and Justice; all intelligence agencies; the Office of Personnel Management; General Services Administration; and the Office of Management and Budget are established priorities, as are the work of Congress and the federal judiciary.

The rest of the Cabinet and the independent agencies seem to have been established solely to expand governmental assistance and control. They do little besides increase the costly regulatory burden on the productive class and rain cash on problems without solving them.

At this point, a multipath approach is needed, starting with across-the-board measures.

Get rid of the baddies. If the federal cyber corps were to do an unannounced overnight purge of all federal devices (computers, laptops, smartphones, etc.) for porn, then thousands of pink slips could be handed out the next day. Do not replace that number of employees. I’m sure Elon could help write the necessary algorithm.

Halt stupid policies in their tracks. Abolish anything that remotely smacks of DEI. Halt all payments related to gender transition. There is no climate crisis. Stop all “green/sustainability” regulations and abolish all attendant projects. For example, $29.3 billion of Energy’s $51 billion FY-2025 budget request is identified for “climate.”

Halt enforcement of all agency-promulgated regulations across all agencies that cannot be directly tied to specific legislative language. Halt all support for illegal activities, including any funding going to illegal migrants or those supporting their movement to and dwelling in the US. Stop all federal activities that promote discrimination, such as grant and contract set-asides for certain genders, races, communities, etc. Get rid of the Jones Act, The Davis-Bacon Act, and any other legislation that increases the cost of federal activities for no benefit.

Retain only competent hires. The government only employs adults. Those adults get trained annually on cybersecurity, prohibited workplace practices, ethics, etc. This training should take place one time, upon employment, with the new hire promising to abide by all the rules for the duration of their employment upon penalty of immediate termination.

Cut federal research grants. Fund only half the cost of staff, equipment, supplies, and services for a research project. If an outside organization can’t find independent funding to cover the other half, plus infrastructure and travel, then there is no need to pursue a proposed avenue of research.

Cut essential agencies down to the quick. Ask the mid- and lower-level managers where the fat is and where nonessential or duplicative work is being funded. They’ll tell you far sooner than those wanting to control an empire.

Ask the hard questions. Is there a need for mail delivery at home? Why should all citizens pay for any local public transportation or for Amtrak when it mostly only serves the NE? Why do welfare payments cover food for a family, yet we still pay for school lunches for the poor?

Start all other agencies at zero. We’re not talking about saving money here; we’re talking about justifying any federal presence and expenses. Why is an agency, commission, or board needed at the federal level? Is there any federal requirement that the states can’t accomplish with their own funds? Is there any need for the Department of Education or the EPA? Why can’t most agencies or their overseas offices be subsumed into the State Department (e.g., USAID, Peace Corps, Commerce, and Agriculture)? Why is Veterans Affairs not part of Defense? Why is Homeland Security not part of Justice? Why isn’t the US Trade Representative part of Commerce? Chop off the few top layers and just incorporate the work they do. Is there any justification for PBS?

It’s 2024. Do we still need federal intervention in farming? Housing? Labor? With less going to the federal government, the people would have a much greater voice in how their tax dollars are spent and ensure that the greatest benefit is to local needs.

Abolish federal student loan guarantees; if individuals or universities are responsible for funding higher education, you can bet the cost will go down and success will go up.

Stop passing money through the federal government. It raises the cost of a project by at least 40% for overhead of collecting, managing, and distributing the funding. So, the $1,200 you received during the SARS-CoV19 scare cost about $1,680 in tax money (yours and your children’s, plus interest).

I like good governance and don’t mind paying for it. However, many see the government as both Mommy and Santa Claus. But it’s not. Letting the government run wild for “the greater good” is a very bad idea.

Some universally applicable regulations and attendant costs make sense. Enforcing minimum workplace, transportation, food, drug, and environmental safety standards are generally good ideas. Spending nearly $60 million of everyone’s taxbucks on a 25-mile stretch of highway to enhance habitat for the Olympic mudminnow was not.

By the midterms, half of Trump’s appointees should have worked themselves out of a job.

The post Yes, We Can Shrink The Size And Cost Of Government appeared first on The Hemet & San Jacinto Chronicle.