So the former Fox News host is deploying a new campaign strategy in the race for California governor: attack fellow Republican candidate Chad Bianco.

During the recent televised debate that featured some of the leading candidates in the gubernatorial contest, Hilton referred to Bianco as a “RINO,” a term that stands for “Republican in name only” and is used to insinuate someone is not a loyal or true Republican.

Hilton also criticized Bianco for kneeling with protesters during tense demonstrations in 2020 in the wake of George Floyd‘s murder. Bianco, in a news interview at the time, said he wanted to get past “this big huge divide, where it’s us vs. them” and agreed with “the concept of this protest” until it was no longer peaceful.

“Chad Bianco has more baggage than LAX,” Hilton said during the debate, referring to his fellow GOP contender as “shifty sheriff.”

This pivot in strategy, Hilton said in an interview after the debate, is all about making it through the primary.

Both Bianco and Hilton have consistently topped polls in the race for governor, while Democrats struggle to break through with a clear frontrunner in the deep blue state. Bianco is 2 percentage points ahead of Hilton in Real Clear Politics’ aggregate of polls, followed by Rep. Eric Swalwell and former Rep. Katie Porter, who trail Hilton by 1.5 and 2 percentage points, respectively.

“The Republican vote is being split between me and Chad Bianco,” Hilton said. That means, he said, there’s a good chance two Democrats will make it through the June election to vie for the governor’s seat in the general election.

“I think our responsibility is that we make sure that we don’t have a split vote and have two Democrats in the top two,” Hilton said. “My job is to do everything I think we can do to avoid that disastrous outcome and get behind one Republican candidate, the strongest one. I think that’s me.”

Election observers say Hilton’s point about splitting the vote isn’t wrong.

“It’s simple math. You can’t get to a plurality or even second most by splitting the Republican vote,” said Matt Lesenyie, an expert in political psychology who teaches at Cal State Long Beach.

“There just aren’t enough Republicans in the state to spare on a candidate with no chances (the Republican running second) since the top two vote-getters will not be Republicans,” Lesenyie added. “It’s gut check time, time to ask: Is their candidacy a vanity project or a committed and strategic run for governor?”

Hilton, of course, said he believes he’s the committed candidate.

Bianco — who did not attend the debate, reportedly because of a scheduling conflict — did not respond to multiple requests for comment for this story.

But in a social media post the day after the debate, Bianco said he is a “doer.”

“If you want to elect a talker, there are plenty of options,” the post said. “If you want a doer, that’s me. Ask the officers under my command who they trust. Ask the business owners who stayed open during COVID.  Ask the people who have been here fighting the fight with me for decades.”

Although they are both Republicans and both gubernatorial contenders, Bianco and Hilton hail from vastly different worlds.

Hilton, 56, is a British-born global businessman who helped get David Cameron elected as the United Kingdom’s prime minister before becoming a Fox News host. He moved to the Bay Area in 2012 and, in 2023, founded Golden Together, a policy organization.

Bianco, who is often seen sporting a cowboy hat, grew up in a small mining town in Utah, moving to Southern California in 1989. Four years later, he graduated from the San Bernardino Sheriff’s Academy at, according to his campaign bio, the top of his class.

To many, the 58-year-old is the no-nonsense, law-and-order candidate who championed Proposition 36, the 2024 voter-approved ballot measure that increased penalties for certain drug and retail theft crimes, and has made public safety a pillar of his campaign.

Hilton’s recent attacks on Bianco — giving him nicknames à la President Donald Trump’s own notorious way for going after political opponents and launching a website that attempts to tie the sheriff to the Black Lives Matter movement in a demeaning way — is keeping in line with his persona, said Dan Schnur, who teaches political messaging at USC and UC Berkeley.

“He’s a much more aggressive presence on the campaign trail. This strategy reinforces the way he (Hilton) wants voters to think about him,” Schnur said.

Hilton, meanwhile, insisted he’s open to working with Bianco.

And he isn’t asking the other Republican contenders for statewide office he’s running alongside — lieutenant governor candidate Gloria Romero, attorney general contender Michael Gates and controller contestant Herb Morgan are campaigning as what they’re calling “California’s Golden Ticket” — to avoid appearing with Bianco at other events. (Gates, for example, is scheduled to appear at a Conservative Patriots of Orange County gathering in Santa Ana with Bianco later this month, according to an invitation for the event.)

Should Hilton prove to be successful and make it through the primary, Schnur does not believe his attacking Bianco will turn away any of the Riverside County sheriff’s Republican supporters in the fall.

“The playbook is much different today than it might have been 10 years ago. Voters are much more tolerant of one member attacking another member of their party than they might have been in the past,” said Schnur.

And whether Bianco actually heeds Hilton’s call to drop out of the race, well, that’s a bit of a long shot, election observers said.

“The goal of Hilton’s message is probably less to convince Bianco to step aside but to convince his voters to switch their allegiance,” Schnur said.

“Assuming that one or the other does finish in the top two in June, they have an uphill fight to November,” he added.

“But you can’t fight that fight unless you get there.”

The post In the race for governor, Steve Hilton has a new target: fellow Republican Chad Bianco appeared first on The Hemet & San Jacinto Chronicle.

The ban on employment would apply to those who are actively involved in arresting and deporting people between Jan. 20, 2025, and Jan. 20, 2029 — the duration of President Donald Trump‘s second term — and would disqualify them from future employment as a police officer, peace officer, public school teacher or civil servant, among other jobs.

“I am introducing a bill today that draws a moral line here in California. We’re calling it like we see it, like we feel it, and respectfully, the GTFO ICE Bill — in other words, Get the Feds Out,” said Assemblymember Mark González, D-Los Angeles, apparently playing off another acronym that normally involves an expletive.

The official text of the proposed bill was not yet available on Friday, Feb. 6, but González, who is co-introducing the legislation with Speaker Robert Rivas, D-Hollister, said people who engage in permissible law enforcement activities as outlined under California’s sanctuary state law, known as Senate Bill 54, would be exempt from his proposed employment ban. (An example of an exemption would be if a law enforcement agent arrested a violent, convicted offender.)

The intent of the bill, he said, is to bar future public employment for agents who are on the ground and actively rounding up and arresting people as part of Trump’s mass deportation program.

“The message is very simple: If you choose to terrorize communities instead of serving them, California will not reward you with a public paycheck,” González said during a news conference.

González said details of the bill are still being worked out and hasn’t decided whether the restriction on future public employment in California should be a lifetime ban.

The news conference was held outside the Japanese American National Museum in Los Angeles’ Little Tokyo. The location was no accident.

It was there in 1942 that Japanese Americans were ordered to report and be transported to internment camps during World War II.

It was also there that federal agents carried out an immigration enforcement operation last August as Gov. Gavin Newsom led a kickoff rally in support of Proposition 50, the congressional redistricting measure which voters ultimately passed.

State Sen. María Elena Durazo, D-Los Angeles, who is considering signing on as a co-author of the proposed legislation, said since Trump returned to office, “immigration enforcement has transformed into something unrecognizable — militarized authoritarian force that operates without warrants, without accountability, without any sense of humanity.”

Similar legislation was introduced last month by Assemblymember Anamarie Ávila Farías, a Democrat from the Bay Area.

Her bill would disqualify someone from becoming a peace officer or working in school settings — as a teacher, principal, superintendent or other administrative positions, for example — if they worked for ICE between Sept. 1, 2025, and Jan. 20, 2029, or for corrections departments in Alabama or Georgia between Jan. 1, 2020, and Jan. 1, 2026.

Democrats in the Legislature are pushing a number of immigration-related bills this year.

The Senate recently advanced legislation that would make it easier for people to sue federal immigration officials if their civil rights are violated.

Sen. Tony Strickland — who, along with the rest of his GOP colleagues, voted against S.B. 747, the No Kings Act passed last month to make it easier to sue federal officials — criticized the effort at the time of the vote as “a little bit more about politics and a little less about policy.”

The post This bill would ban ICE agents from future hiring as a public employee in California appeared first on The Hemet & San Jacinto Chronicle.