The consequences extend well beyond the immediate destruction. Rising wildfire risk is driving up insurance costs for homeowners, threatening iconic natural resources like the state’s giant sequoias, and putting pressure on the mountain watersheds that supply much of California’s drinking water.

Forecasters are warning that 2026 could bring another above-average fire season. Recent years have shown that dangerous fires can erupt even after a wet winter, and the numbers tell a sobering story: severe wildfires have tripled in size across the Sierra Nevada since 1990, while the financial toll from wildfire damage has more than quadrupled over that same period.

It’s understandable that Californians feel exhausted by this pattern. Generations of aggressive fire suppression allowed brush and vegetation to accumulate across the landscape, setting the stage for more destructive blazes. Add a warming climate to the mix, and the conditions for catastrophic fire have only worsened.

There is, however, reason for cautious optimism. State agencies have launched an ambitious, coordinated push to reduce wildfire danger across 1 million acres of wildland every year — a goal overseen by a state task force and matched to the scale of the crisis at hand.

A new analysis from the Public Policy Institute of California, drawing on data tracked by that task force, found real momentum building. Between 2021 and 2024, the state averaged 591,000 acres per year of treatment aimed at reducing wildfire hazard, and that pace has been accelerating.

The task force’s newly unveiled five-year action plan reinforces a “worst first” approach, targeting the most vulnerable landscapes for treatment. That strategy appears to be working: 83% of the acreage treated through thinning, controlled burns and other methods was located in zones with high wildfire potential, areas where homes and wildlands meet, or both.

One of the clearest successes has been the resurgence of what’s known as beneficial fire — a practice with deep roots in California history. Native tribes used low-intensity, controlled burns to manage the land for thousands of years before European settlement disrupted that tradition. Now, prescribed and cultural burning is making a comeback, with acreage treated this way nearly doubling from roughly 100,000 acres in 2021 to about 200,000 acres in 2024.

That growth in prescribed and cultural burning offers a relatively low-cost, ecologically sound path toward restoring forest and woodland health across the state.

But this progress faces real headwinds. Federal agencies are stepping back from commitments to reduce wildfire risk, and the U.S. Forest Service — which oversees more than half of California’s forestland, along with other federal partners — has seen significant budget and staffing cuts. That retreat introduces new uncertainty into California’s broader wildfire strategy.

State funding is also on shakier ground. California’s wildfire mitigation budget could shrink by hundreds of millions of dollars as key revenue streams dry up. Lawmakers recently voted to restructure the state’s cap-and-trade program, which charges polluters for their emissions, a change expected to cut roughly $200 million a year from wildfire prevention funding.

Without stable, dedicated funding, this work — which affects public health, housing costs, water supplies and far more — simply won’t happen at the scale California needs.

Our research points to several ways the task force could sharpen its approach going forward. That includes better tracking of how long fire-reduction treatments actually remain effective, and providing more support to smaller, under-resourced partners so that mitigation work on private land — which may currently go unreported — gets properly counted.

Above all, this effort depends on a strong working relationship between state and federal agencies, a partnership that has already produced measurable results. Protecting that collaboration should be treated as a top priority.

The risks facing California communities keep growing, but so does the progress being made to confront them. This is the wrong moment to let that momentum slip away.

Original source: CalMatters

The post California Has Made Fire Prevention Gains, But Federal Cutbacks and Funding Woes Threaten That Progress appeared first on The Hemet & San Jacinto Chronicle.

CAL FIRE is ramping up staffing levels, particularly in the wake of last month’s lightning that caused over 110,000 strikes and burned nearly 29,000 acres.

The National Weather Service predicts thunderstorms through next week, with a high chance of dry lightning, which can spark new fires.

CAL FIRE says they are preparing with more staffing, additional resources in both Northern and Southern California, including extra fire crews, reserve engines, and command centers.

CAL FIRE Chief Joe Tyler urges Californians to stay alert and follow safety measures, including seeking shelter during storms and reporting any signs of smoke or fire immediately.

For wildfire preparedness, community members are encouraged to pack emergency go-bags and sign up for local alerts.

For more information on wildfire preparedness, visit www.ReadyForWildfire.org or www.fire.ca.gov.

The post Governor Newsom prepares California for lightning threat as wildfire risk rises appeared first on The Hemet & San Jacinto Chronicle.

That money comes from Proposition 4, the November ballot measure that authorized a $10 billion bond to pay for climate-related projects such as water systems and wildfire mitigation.

In his January budget proposal, Gov. Gavin Newsom recommended that $325 million of the bond money should be allocated in the upcoming fiscal year to a variety of wildfire prevention programs. The remainder would be spent over the next five years. 

But Democratic Assemblymember Steve Bennett, chair of the budget subcommittee on climate, energy and transportation, told the administration in a hearing on Wednesday that the state should pursue a focused strategy to make the most use of limited resources.

“It can’t be a little bit here, and a little bit here, and a little bit here,” said Bennett, who represents Oxnard. “We need a comprehensive plan to say these are the resources we have; by linking these things together, this is how we could maximize our effectiveness.”

Robyn Fennig, assistant director for Hazard Mitigation for the state’s Office of Emergency Services,  described the proposal for the upcoming fiscal year as one part of a broader strategy that might include trying to secure matching federal funds.

Bennett also noted that the state faces an enormous challenge to address the threats from climate change. 

“There has been a sea change in terms of what’s happening as a result of climate change,” Bennett said. “The home insurance crisis was serious, but it’s now going to be unmanageable for California if we don’t find a way to decrease our losses when these wildfires sweep it near or into communities.”

State Fire Marshal Daniel Berlant, defended the administration’s approach.

“I completely agree that [home-hardening] has to be a focal point, but our strategy has to be doing all of these things together,” he told lawmakers. “If we’re not managing the forest, we’re going to have large forest fires that burn right into our communities. ”

The bond measure language, approved by the Legislature last year, offers some flexibility on how to spend the money, Rachel Ehlers, a policy analyst with the Legislative Analyst’s Office, said at the hearing. 

But that flexibility leaves some questions for lawmakers, she said, flagging a  proposal in the governor’s budget plan to add an additional $9 million to a pilot program that gives homeowners financial assistance to make their homes more fire-resistant.

“Do you want the funding to go deep and have fewer structures that are protected, but have more of them covered? Or do you want it wide, where you’re giving smaller grants that won’t protect the whole structure, but maybe more properties get access to it? What regions of the state do you want to focus on?”

For the pilot program, established in 2019,the administration’s approach was to target the most vulnerable communities, Berlant said. 

Six counties currently are participating in it, based on factors including population health and age, as well as wildfire risk and other climate data. The state reports 17 homes have completed the fire-proofing process and another 23 are in progress. The additional money could expand the program to two more counties.

The selection process could be similar for one of the new programs proposed under the Prop. 4 funding: providing financial assistance to vulnerable Californians to create a five-foot zone around their home that could protect it from burning down. 

“You talked about, how do we prioritize? We can’t help everybody,” said Berlant. “We can educate everybody, but those that are most vulnerable who can’t physically do this work, who can’t financially afford to do this work, this program will provide funding to assist them.” 

The administration noted that Newsom’s budget proposal is a work in progress — one that was drafted prior to the Southern California wildfires.

“I recognize we have to do all the above and I recognize it is fiendishly difficult to try to figure out, “Do we do 10% here, etcetera there,” Bennett said at the hearing. “In my mind, there has not been enough focus yet on (home) hardening and I think we’re starting to recognize that.” 

The post Californians approved $1.5 billion for wildfire prevention. How will the state spend it? appeared first on The Hemet & San Jacinto Chronicle.

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA — The Board of Supervisors is expected to authorize Cal Fire/Riverside County Fire Department Chief Bill Weiser to close access to multiple outdoor recreational locations for the duration of the Southern California Wildfire Season to minimize public safety risks.

The closure was slated to begin Tuesday through the fire season.

Cal Fire regularly closes designated grounds in the central and southwest portions of the county — typically from June to November.

The 2024 closures would take effect on June 1, according to preliminary statements by Cal Fire officials.

“Due to the potential for large damaging human-caused fires, the county fire chief has determined these areas should be closed, except on public roadways and on inhabited areas of private property within the closure areas,” the statement said. “The potential for large damaging fires … this year may be enhanced by the extreme vegetation growth experienced throughout Riverside County.”

Since the rainy season, wildflower overgrowth and blooms have covered previously open trails, especially in the western half of the county.

According to Cal Fire, wildfires in any of the proposed closure locations would be “difficult to manage, given their terrain and remoteness, “officials said.

The following sites would fall under the county’s closure order:

• Bautista Canyon, southeast of Hemet;
• Eagle Canyon, between Lake Mathews and the county landfill, just north of Cajalco Road;
• Indian Canyon and North Mountain, around San Jacinto;
• the Ramona Bowl, south of Hemet;
• Steel Peek, northwest of Meadowbrook, due west of Good Hope and south of Gavilan Hills; and
• Whitewater Canyon, near Cabazon.

The Ramona Bowl would remain accessible between sunrise and noon daily, with the area off limits any other time of day, according to officials.

Still, by reducing foot and off-road vehicle traffic in each location, the chances of a wildfire starting are much slimmer, according to the fire department.

Hikers will be able to see easily marked closure signs at trail entry points to warn potential violators of fines and other penalties.

First offenses usually result in a minimum $100 ticket.

Residents who live in the area of a closure would be permitted to come and go as they please.

The closures are usually lifted at year’s end but can be rescinded before then by the chief, depending on the timing of winter rains.

The post 6 RivCo Hiking Trail Closures Expected, $100 Fine During Fire Season appeared first on The Hemet & San Jacinto Chronicle.