Local PV power lost to dirty panels

Date:

When, if ever, have you cleaned the solar panels on your roof? I did some research and discovered that Valley residents haven’t cleaned their photovoltaic solar panels in months, if ever. The combined wasted total potential energy losses must be huge.

I recently spoke with a former Valley resident who owned property in Diamond Valley with nine panels, set on ground-mounted posts and frames. He did not set the panels on his roof because roof mounting would have required paying an engineer to determine if such loading was possible. Therefore, he chose the easier ground-mounting option to save on engineering costs. He also trenched and installed the one-inch conduit between the panel array and the switch box near the Edison meter.

Because of the way the panels were installed, he found it easy to keep them clean with regular attention once a month. After the first few cleanings, involving rinsing, soft mop swabbing, and a final rinse before sunrise, he started to note the approximate improvement in output. The post-cleaning output usually rebounded by approximately 10 percent.
During a drive along Domenigoni Parkway, the solar array owner noted that almost all solar panels on most houses looked “different,” and one person in the car remarked that they were probably pool heating panels.

After some serious questioning of those who know about such technicalities, I discovered that most panels are indeed crusted with dust and dirt, and might be losing between 10 and 15 percent efficiency. Something that confirmed the problem of severe dirt on panels was one panel on a house with a palm tree that had its leaves sweeping about half of the panel. One half of the panel was clean, shiny, and dark in color, but above the swept area, the panel had the same beige, dirty look observed on solar panels throughout the San Jacinto Valley.

How much power is being lost is still up for discussion or examination. Nevertheless, if we are losing as much as 15 percent of our energy because of dirty panels, it’s like throwing good money and significant power away.

I would like to thank Lance Johannsen, a native son, and a retired EMWD civil engineer, for bringing this matter to my attention. Reporters sometimes get more done than our politicos.
So, folks, house-cleaning should also include cleaning your expensive solar panels periodically. Remember one ironclad rule about such situations: We don’t always know the good we have until inactivity costs us the day.


Just sayin”

[email protected]

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

Vote Yes on Proposition 45: A Vote for Jobs and Innovation

A yes vote on Proposition 45 is a vote for jobs and innovation.

San Jacinto Planning Commission recommends two annexations, including 151 homes south of Ramona Expressway

The San Jacinto Planning Commission voted 3-0 Tuesday to recommend two sphere-of-influence annexations to the City Council, including Tentative Tract Map 34271 for 151 single-family lots south of Ramona Expressway. Neither file is a completed annexation.

Shooters Hemet restored to full permit; A placard, score 92

Shooters Sports Bar & Grill at 121 E. Florida Ave. was approved Sept. 22 to open back to full permit status, and the A placard was re-posted. The county report lists a manual score of 92, with no live or dead cockroach activity observed and a surveillance recheck by Sept. 29.

How They Voted: Hemet adopts SKR fees 4-1; Males no; cannabis and Measure U items 5-0

Hemet City Council adopted Ordinance 2081 on Sept. 22, setting Stephens' kangaroo rat mitigation fees on a 4-1 vote with Mayor Pro Tem Joe Males opposed. The rest of consent, including commercial cannabis and $20,000 in Measure U for Fire Station 3, passed 5-0.