California “No Secret Police Act” introduced, would ban police from covering their faces

Date:

Two California lawmakers introduced a measure Monday that seeks to ban law enforcement at all levels of government from covering their faces during operations including immigration enforcement.

The legislation would also require officers “to be identifiable via their uniform, whether with name or other identifier,” according to Democratic Sens. Scott Wiener of San Francisco and Jesse Arreguin of Berkeley, who introduced Senate Bill 627, also known as the “No Secret Police Act.”

The bill would prohibit local, state and federal law enforcement officers, or any person acting on behalf of a law enforcement agency from covering their faces. The measure includes exceptions for SWAT teams, medical-grade masks such as surgical or N95 masks, and masks designed to protect against smoke during a wildfire-related state of emergency.

Wiener said the legislation was prompted by the Trump administration’s recent immigration crackdown and reports of federal agents wearing masks and allegedly not identifying themselves during operations.

“People are afraid, families are being torn apart,” the senator said at a news conference in San Francisco on Monday. “And it’s important that anyone who is engaged in law enforcement activity whether state, county or whether its federal that there’s full transparency in terms of what happening.”

The lawmakers said they believed the measure would improve public trust in law enforcement.

“This law is rooted in two principles. One, to protect the safety of California’s communities. And two, to ensure that there is transparency and accountability for law enforcement,” Arreguin said.

In an interview with Margaret Brennan of “Face the Nation” on June 8, Homeland Security secretary Kristi Noem has defended law enforcement covering their faces.

“It’s for the safety of those individuals or the work that they’re doing as far as protecting their identity so they can continue to do investigative work,” Noem said.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

Valley-Wide packet: Winchester Zone 33 parks tax up to $1,697 per SF unit; Annex 14 WQMP up to $175 — Sept. 21 agenda

The Sept. 21, 2026 Valley-Wide agenda packet lists a Winchester Zone 33 parks-tax maximum of $1,697 per single-family unit and an Annexation 14 WQMP maximum of $175. Landowner election results and final adoption are not confirmed in posted minutes.

Kohler booked on murder, hit-run death after Palm Avenue scooter crash

Mason Drew Kohler, 31, was booked on felony murder, hit-and-run death, and DUI charges, according to the Riverside County jail roster, which lists a Hemet PD arrest at Palm Avenue and Commonwealth Avenue. Hemet police say two pedestrians on an electric scooter were struck there about 6:55 a.m. Tuesday, Sept. 22; one was pronounced dead. Police have not named the driver, and the decedent's identity remains withheld.

Vote Yes on Proposition 45: A Vote for Jobs and Innovation

A yes vote on Proposition 45 is a vote for jobs and innovation.

San Jacinto Planning Commission recommends two annexations, including 151 homes south of Ramona Expressway

The San Jacinto Planning Commission voted 3-0 Tuesday to recommend two sphere-of-influence annexations to the City Council, including Tentative Tract Map 34271 for 151 single-family lots south of Ramona Expressway. Neither file is a completed annexation.