Garden Grove Evacuations Raise Concerns Over Safety of Seniors and Residents With Disabilities

Date:

The chemical emergency that prompted evacuations in Garden Grove last month has raised broader questions about whether seniors, people with disabilities and medically fragile residents can safely leave during a fast-moving disaster.

Officials ordered or urged tens of thousands of Orange County residents to evacuate after a leak involving methyl methacrylate at GKN Aerospace. The chemical, used in plastics and resins, is flammable and can cause health effects including breathing problems, nausea, nosebleeds, skin irritation and, in serious cases, hospitalization.

State officials declared an emergency, and about 50,000 people were told to follow evacuation directions. Public agencies announced shelters, care centers and hotlines for residents seeking help.

But disability advocates say those resources do not necessarily amount to a workable evacuation plan for people who cannot simply get into a car, drive away and sleep in a public shelter.

For a bedbound senior who depends on a caregiver, leaving home may require medical transport and continuous personal care. A resident who uses a power wheelchair may not be able to ride in a standard vehicle. Hospice patients, people who rely on oxygen, those needing dialysis, wound care or hospital beds, and residents with complex medical conditions may not be safe in a crowded gymnasium or community shelter.

Kelley Barrett, a retired nonprofit administrator who advocates for people with disabilities, said the Garden Grove incident exposed a persistent gap in emergency planning: public notices often tell residents where to go, but do not clearly explain how people with serious care needs will be identified, contacted, transported and housed safely.

Standard shelters may be suitable for evacuees who can walk, manage their own medication, use public restrooms, tolerate crowds and sleep on a cot. They are far less practical for residents who need caregivers, medical equipment, accessible bathrooms, wheelchair charging, oxygen support or medically appropriate placement.

Advocates are calling for counties to maintain active “access and functional needs” evacuation systems that go beyond written plans or website postings. Such systems, they argue, should include coordination with In-Home Supportive Services, Adult Protective Services, hospice providers, home health agencies, senior housing sites, regional centers and medical baseline programs.

They also say evacuation operations should include accessible transportation, medical transport, caregiver access, medication support, language access and shelters equipped for people with disabilities or significant health needs.

The Garden Grove emergency also has prompted calls for more transparency after major evacuations. Advocates say counties should report how many in-home care recipients, hospice patients, home health patients and oxygen-dependent residents were in evacuation zones; how many lacked transportation; how many were contacted directly; and where medically fragile residents were ultimately taken.

Those destinations could include accessible shelters, medical shelters, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, hotels or relatives’ homes. Without public reporting, advocates say, it is difficult to know whether vulnerable residents were safely assisted or left to make their own arrangements.

The concerns are not aimed at firefighters, police officers or emergency workers, who often respond under dangerous conditions. Rather, advocates say the issue is whether emergency systems are built to include people who cannot self-evacuate.

California has emphasized aging in place, disability rights and health equity, but emergency planning must reflect those commitments, advocates say. When officials tell the public to leave, they argue, there must also be a clear plan for those who cannot leave without help.

The Garden Grove chemical emergency has therefore become about more than the contents of a leaking tank. It has also become a test of whether disaster planning in Southern California protects residents who are elderly, disabled, homebound or medically fragile.

Original source: CalMatters

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

Medical Providers May Be Recording Mental Health Care Visits

Kaiser Permanente’s use of an artificial intelligence tool to...

Newsom Says DOJ Interviews With Friends Signal He’s on Trump’s ‘Hit List’

Gov. Gavin Newsom on Monday accused President Donald Trump’s...

California Lawmakers Push for Higher Education Spending as Newsom Weighs Budget

California lawmakers are moving ahead with a $356 billion...

San Manuel Nation Completes $33.2 Million Purchase of Riverside’s Historic Mission Inn

    The historic Mission Inn Hotel & Spa in downtown...