Improper Payments Fact Sheet


What You Need to Know:

  • Improper payments represent payments that do not meet program requirements.
  • The vast majority of improper payments occur in regards to people who may be eligible for care, but for whom there was an unintentional payment error or a reviewer cannot determine if a payment was proper due to insufficient payment documentation from a state or a provider.
  • Improper payments do not necessarily represent expenditures that should not have occurred and can include both overpayments and underpayments situations where there is insufficient documentation to determine if a payment is proper in accordance with program payment requirements.
  • While fraud and abuse are improper payments, they are not synonymous; it is important to note that most improper payments are not attributable to fraud, and improper payment estimates are not fraud rate estimates.

Improper Payment Measurements:


  • CMS developed the Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) program to estimate the Medicare Fee-For-Service (FFS) program’s improper payment rate.
    • The CERT program cites improper payments in accordance with payment policies on any claim: 1) that was paid when it should have been denied or paid at another amount (including both overpayments and underpayments); and/or 2) for which documentation was insufficient to be an improper payment.
    • The CERT program reviews a statistically valid stratified random sample of Medicare FFS claims to determine if they were paid properly under Medicare coverage, coding, and billing rules. If these criteria are not met, the claim is counted as either a total or partial improper payment.
  • The majority of Medicare FFS improper payments fall into two categories:
    • (1) insufficient documentation; and
    • (2) the documentation provided for the items or services billed did not sufficiently demonstrate medical necessity.


  • CMS estimates Medicaid and CHIP improper payments using the Payment Error Rate Measurement (PERM) program.
    • The PERM program uses a 3-year, 17 state rotation, meaning each state is reviewed once every three years and each cycle measurement includes one-third of all states. The most recent three cycles (2021, 2020, and 2019) combined to form each year’s overall national rate.
    • PERM ensures a statistically valid random sample representative of all Medicaid and CHIP payments matched with federal funds meets a national precision requirement where CMS is 95% confident that the Medicaid and CHIP improper payment rates are within +/- 3 percentage points.
    • The Medicaid and CHIP improper payment national rates are based on reviews of the FFS, managed care, and eligibility components of a State’s Medicaid and CHIP program in the year under review.
    • In addition, the PERM program combines individual state component estimates to calculate the national component estimates. National component rates and the Medicaid and CHIP rates are weighted by state size, such that a state with a $10 billion program is weighted more in the national rate than a state with a $1 billion program. A correction factor in the methodology ensures that each Medicaid improper payment is counted only once in the combined national rate.
  • Medicaid and CHIP improper payment data released by CMS are based on reviews of whether states are implementing their Medicaid and CHIP programs in accordance with federal and state payment and eligibility policies.

Improper Payments Do Not Necessarily Indicate Fraud:

  • Improper payment rates are not measures of fraud in CMS programs. Most improper payments are caused by improper or inadequate documentation. 
  • Improper payments do not necessarily represent expenditures that should not have occurred.
    • For example, a majority of improper payments are due to instances where information required for payment was missing, documentation that an eligibility determination was made correctly was missing from the state system, states did not follow the appropriate process for enrolling providers, and/or states did not follow the appropriate process for determining beneficiary eligibility. However, these improper payments do not necessarily represent payments to illegitimate providers or on behalf of ineligible beneficiaries. Had the missing information been on the claim and/or had the state complied with the enrollment or redetermination requirements, then the claims may have been payable. A smaller proportion of improper payments are instances where the State Agency had sufficient documentation to determine that payments should not have been made or should have been made in different amounts, which are considered monetary losses to the Federal Government (e.g., medical necessity, incorrect coding, and other errors).
  • Improper payments can result from a variety of circumstances, including:
    • 1) services with no documentation,
    • 2) services with insufficient documentation, or
    • 3) no record of the required verification of an individual’s eligibility, such as income, specifically for Medicaid and CHIP.
  • Proper payments occur when there is sufficient documentation to support payment in accordance with the program payment requirements. Two examples of proper payments include:
    • Payments where the state appropriately maintained documentation of an eligibility verification requirement and appropriately determined eligibility based on program eligibility and payment requirements.
    • Payments where sufficient documentation was provided to support medical necessity in accordance with program payment requirements.

Improper Payment Reporting Criteria

  • The Payment Integrity Information Act of 2019 defines significant improper payments are defined as either:
    •  (i) improper payments greater than $10 million and over 1.5 percent of all payments made under that program, or
    • (ii) improper payments greater than $100 million.
  • The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has identified Medicare Fee-For-Service (FFS), Medicare Part C, Medicare Part D, Medicaid, and the Children’s Health Insurance Program as susceptible to significant improper payments. The Advanced Premium Tax Credit program has also been identified as susceptible to significant improper payments. In FY 2021, CMS completed the development of the Federally-facilitated Exchange improper payment measurement and commenced measurement activities for future reporting.

CMS/State Collaboration on Improper Payments

  • CMS collaborates with states in many ways to share information and help to ensure they maintain the proper documentation to demonstrate that payments are being made correctly. Examples include:
    • Medicaid Eligibility Quality Control (MEQC) Program: Under MEQC, states design and conduct pilots to evaluate the processes that determine an individual’s eligibility for Medicaid and CHIP benefits. States have flexibility in designing pilots to focus on vulnerable or error-prone areas as identified by the PERM program and state. The MEQC program also reviews eligibility determinations that are not reviewed under the PERM program, such as denials and terminations.
    • Enhanced State PERM Corrective Action Plan Process: CMS works with states to coordinate state development of corrective action plans to address each error and deficiency identified during the PERM cycle. After each state submits the corrective action plan, CMS monitors each state’s progress in implementing effective corrective actions. Throughout the process, CMS also provides training opportunities to ensure compliance with federal policies.
    • State Medicaid Provider Screening and Enrollment Data and Tools: CMS shares Medicare data to assist states with meeting Medicaid screening and enrollment requirements.
    • Enhanced Assistance on State Medicaid Provider Screening and Enrollment: CMS provides ongoing guidance, education, and outreach to states on federal requirements for Medicaid provider screening and enrollment. CMS also assesses provider screening and enrollment compliance, provides technical assistance, and offers states the opportunity to leverage Medicare screening and enrollment activities.
    • Medicaid Integrity Institute (MII): CMS offers training, technical assistance, and support to state Medicaid program integrity officials through the MII. More information is located at the Medicaid Integrity Institute website.

Find your latest news here at the Hemet & San Jacinto Chronicle


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe to The Hemet & San Jacinto Chronicle


More like this

These are California’s dirtiest beaches. Where are you swimming this summer?

As Mother Nature continues to turn up the heat this summer, those looking to cool off along the California coast might want to reconsider where they’re swimming.

‘A dystopian plot’: how will Trump’s Project 2025 affect California?

Donald Trump has not been shy about attacking California on the presidential campaign trail, telling fellow conservatives that “the place is failing” under Democratic party leadership.

Navy Exonerates Black Sailors Unfairly Convicted After World War II Disaster

On July 17, 1944, hundreds of sailors were loading ammunition onto two cargo ships in Port Chicago, Calif., not far from San Francisco, when an explosion powerful enough to be felt 50 miles away killed 320 of the men, most of them Black.

Can Democrats Find the Courage to Tell Biden the Truth?

Before I get to President Biden, let me tell you about my love for a different presidential candidate. In 1972, when I was 13 years old, I knocked on doors to canvass for George McGovern, the Democratic senator who wanted to end the Vietnam War.