Florida Man Who Moved to California for Work Is Suing Employer for Ordering Him to Cut His Hair

Date:

His hair wasn’t a problem in Florida

A Florida man, Jeffrey Thornton is suing his employer – the Encore Group – under California’s CROWN Act. He claims they’re discriminating against him over his dreadlocks.

Thornton had worked for the corporation in Miami and Orlando since 2016, but after the global pandemic put him on furlough, he decided to relocate to San Diego to keep his job.

His new manager wasn’t happy that he was capable of doing his work and had good references from his former colleagues – instead they insisted that he needed to have his dreadlocks cut if he wanted to keep his job. As Thornton put it: “If it wasn’t a problem in Florida, it shouldn’t be a problem in California, right?” He’s now taking legal action against the company.

THE CROWN ACT

Encore Group have immediately gone on the defensive – claiming they prioritize maintaining a diverse and inclusive workspace. But this may not cut it, given the specifics of the CROWN Act which was accepted in California but rejected in Florida.

CROWN stands for “Creating a respectful and open world for natural hair” and was intended to protect individuals from cultural or racial discrimination based on their hairstyle or length.

California saw fit to accept the act into law in 2019, and it now seems likely that Thornton’s case against Encore Group will set a precedent of employees taking their employers to task if they feel discriminated against based on their hairstyle.

WHAT RELEVANCE IS HAIRSTYLE ANYWAY?

Speaking on his client’s case against Encore, Thornton’s lawyer Adam Kent pointed out the reason why hairstyle should be irrelevant as a deal breaker against giving someone a job: “Professionalism isn’t about fitting into Eurocentric norms. Professionalism is about competency… We all expect to be judged based on our abilities and on our character, but Mr. Thornton is being told in this case that it’s different for him.”

As Thornton had proved through many years of successful employment in the state of Florida, his hair played no part in the quality of his work. It’s ironic that it took a move to California for someone to take issue with it. Time will tell what happens with the lawsuit.

Toby Hazlewood | Contributed

Find your latest news here at the Hemet & San Jacinto Chronicle

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

Valley-Wide packet: Winchester Zone 33 parks tax up to $1,697 per SF unit; Annex 14 WQMP up to $175 — Sept. 21 agenda

The Sept. 21, 2026 Valley-Wide agenda packet lists a Winchester Zone 33 parks-tax maximum of $1,697 per single-family unit and an Annexation 14 WQMP maximum of $175. Landowner election results and final adoption are not confirmed in posted minutes.

Kohler booked on murder, hit-run death after Palm Avenue scooter crash

Mason Drew Kohler, 31, was booked on felony murder, hit-and-run death, and DUI charges, according to the Riverside County jail roster, which lists a Hemet PD arrest at Palm Avenue and Commonwealth Avenue. Hemet police say two pedestrians on an electric scooter were struck there about 6:55 a.m. Tuesday, Sept. 22; one was pronounced dead. Police have not named the driver, and the decedent's identity remains withheld.

Vote Yes on Proposition 45: A Vote for Jobs and Innovation

A yes vote on Proposition 45 is a vote for jobs and innovation.

San Jacinto Planning Commission recommends two annexations, including 151 homes south of Ramona Expressway

The San Jacinto Planning Commission voted 3-0 Tuesday to recommend two sphere-of-influence annexations to the City Council, including Tentative Tract Map 34271 for 151 single-family lots south of Ramona Expressway. Neither file is a completed annexation.