$6 gas intensifies clash between climate and cost of living

Date:

The Chevron refinery in Richmond is located behind a neighborhood on Feb. 21, 2024. Photo by Loren Elliott for CalMatters
The Chevron refinery in Richmond is located behind a neighborhood on Feb. 21, 2024. Photo by Loren Elliott for CalMatters
The Chevron refinery in Richmond on Feb. 21, 2024. Photo by Loren Elliott for CalMatters

For many Californians, unseasonal winds and grass fires in May are reminders that climate change is intensifying extreme weather. But as gas prices continue to rise, a long-running debate in the Capitol is reigniting: Can California consumers afford the state’s nation-leading climate agenda?

As CalMatters’ Alejandro Lazo explains, the Iran war has shot up gas prices to a statewide average of $6 a gallon, and will likely squeeze more out of drivers as the conflict drags on. Two of the state’s refineries have also closed within the last six months, further limiting resources.

The situation prompted the California Air Resources Board to consider providing major companies as much as $4 billion in new free carbon emission permits — with half of those permits reserved for the fossil fuel industry. In exchange for this subsidy in the state’s cap-and-invest program, polluters must commit to investing in clean energy projects.

  • Zach Leary, a lobbyist for the Western States Petroleum Association: “The state is acknowledging that affordability and ambition are not getting along very well right now.”

But environmentalists argue that the plan is a freebie to Big Oil, and weakens California’s cap-and-invest program, which is the only state policy that sets a firm limit on emissions. Critics also say it would wipe out any progress made to reduce emission levels that California set for itself by 2030.

  • Chloe Ames, a policy adviser with NextGen Policy: “We are really concerned that this would significantly kneecap the program.”

State air regulators say that environmentalists’ framing is wrong and that the allowances are limited, temporary, and may be rescinded.

Revenue for state programs that come from carbon market auctions could also fall under the proposal, from about $4 billion annually to $2 billion, according to the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office.

Some lawmakers support the plan. In a joint statement, both heads of the Assembly’s climate and energy committees said the proposal “reflects the Legislature’s focus on affordability.”

The air board will decide whether to approve the plan on May 28.

Read more.


We’re bringing our voter guide to life through VotingMatters events across California this month, in collaboration with on-the-ground partners: Local news organizations, colleges, libraries, churches and nonprofit organizations. Our next events are tonight in Vallejo and Wednesday evening in San Francisco. Plus, we have a DIY kit to host your own event. 


Other Stories You Should Know


Have a question for The Lincoln Project?

Rows of name badges for the CalMatters Ideas Festival sit in black trays on a registration table. The badges display the event logo and the tagline “Smart Conversations that Spark Solutions,” with a shallow depth of field blurring the background.
Passes for CalMatters IdeasFest at the Sheraton Grand Hotel in Sacramento on June 5, 2024. Photo by Larry Valenzuela, CalMatters/CatchLight Local

We’re bringing together some big names in politics, tech and nonprofits this week for our second Ideas Festival and we’d love to hear from you if you have a question for our speakers.

The event will include a main stage discussion reuniting the three founding members of The Lincoln Project, the anti-Trump Republicans who lifted Joe Biden in the 2020 election. We’ll also hear from Cesar Fernandez, Anthropic’s head of U.S. state and local government relations; Julián Castro, the CEO of the Latino Community Foundation; and California Attorney General Rob Bonta.

If you’d like to ask them a question, email [email protected] and they may respond live on stage. If you can’t make it to Sacramento, we will record all the main stage sessions and post them on our site at a later date.

Check out our full list of speakers and get tickets. We hope to see you there!

Community colleges clamp down on fraud

Students with backpacks walk along a campus sidewalk past a sign reading “Financial Aid Office, Cloud Hall, Room 324,” with a large arrow pointing left. A small campus map is mounted below the sign, and trimmed hedges line the walkway.
Students walk past a sign for the financial aid office at City College of San Francisco in San Francisco on Dec. 8, 2017. Photo By Lea Suzuki, the San Francisco Chronicle via Getty Images

Better filtering practices and new software are helping to curb financial aid fraud at California community colleges — a welcomed change from last spring, when colleges saw unprecedented reports of fraud, writes CalMatters’ Adam Echelman.

Colleges reported losing a little under $1.5 million in federal student aid to scammers between January through March and about $330,000 in state aid. Last spring, fraudsters stole nearly $5.6 million in federal aid and over $900,000 in state aid.

The downward trend follows CalMatters’ continual coverage of financial aid fraud, as well as growing scrutiny from federal and state lawmakers. 

Last year, California’s Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office also approved a new identification verification policy for students, and it negotiated a multimillion-dollar contract with a software company that uses artificial intelligence to detect potentially fraudulent applicants. 

It’s important to keep in mind that even when fraud was at its peak last spring, the aid money distributed to scammers accounted for less than 1% of the total financial aid distributed to California community college students. Nevertheless, “the ultimate goal for our system is zero,” said Chris Ferguson, the executive vice chancellor of finance and strategic initiatives. 

Read more.

And lastly: No one at the wheel of Fast Food Council

A McDonald’s location in south Fresno on Sept. 12, 2022. Photo by Larry Valenzuela, CalMatters/CatchLight Local
A McDonald’s location in south Fresno on Sept. 12, 2022. Photo by Larry Valenzuela, CalMatters/CatchLight Local

Lawmakers created California’s first-in-the-nation fast food council in 2023 to allow workers and labor advocates a way to set industry standards on wages, working conditions, safety and health. But the council hasn’t met in over a year and it still lacks a chairperson, leading workers to demand Gov. Gavin Newsom to appoint a chairperson as directed by law. Read more from CalMatters’ Levi Sumagaysay.



Other things worth your time:

Some stories may require a subscription to read.


Nancy Pelosi puts thumb on the scale in race for her successor. Here’s who she endorsed // CalMatters 

Tech leaders funding Mahan’s campaign for CA governor say it’s not about tech // Los Angeles Times

CA water managers raise 2026 deliveries as reservoirs remain near full // The Sacramento Bee

This CA law aims to prevent investors from flipping distressed homes. They’re managing to anyway // The San Diego Union-Tribune

CA lawyers can’t quit AI — even as hallucinated citations pile up // San Francisco Chronicle

AI has invaded the LA mayor’s race. Some fear it’s just the beginning // Los Angeles Times

A must-win CA House seat is giving Dems heartburn // Politico

Three killed in Islamic Center of San Diego shooting, according to SDPD // Times of San Diego

Grizzly bears could return to CA after a 100-year absence // KVPR

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe to The Hemet & San Jacinto Chronicle

Popular

More like this
Related

Moving to California with a gun? You might have to take a four-hour course

A person wearing ear protection and tinted safety glasses aims a handgun at an outdoor shooting range while another person stands closely behind, appearing to offer instruction. Bags and equipment rest on a wooden bench beside them, with hillside terrain blurred in the background.

In summary

Want to buy a gun in California? Lawmakers may have you set aside four hours — and bring ammo for the range

Californians would have to take a four-hour course with live-fire training to buy a gun if a bill advancing through the Legislature gets signed into law.

Senate Bill 948, by Berkeley Democratic Sen. Jesse Arreguín, also would require gun owners moving to California to obtain a firearm safety certificate and register their firearms within 180 days of their arrival. Beginning in 2028, obtaining that certificate would require completing the training.

It’s the latest effort by California Democrats to add more restrictions on firearm ownership in a state that already has some of the toughest gun laws in the country. However, it’s hardly certain the bill will become law. A similar measure died in the Legislature last year.

This year’s proposal advanced from the Senate Appropriations Committee Thursday on a party-line vote with Republicans opposed. Committee members offered no comment on the measure and did not take any public testimony, which is typical for that committee.

But in March, when an earlier version of the bill would have required eight hours of training, Arreguín told the Senate Public Safety Committee the proposed training requirements would reduce gun violence and prevent accidental shootings.

“Firearm safety is essential in preventing firearm-related incidents, especially those involving children,” he said. “By strengthening training requirements and closing gaps in current law, SB 948 will ensure responsible gun ownership to keep Californians and communities safe.”

Rebecca Marcus, a lobbyist for the Brady Campaign, told the committee there were more than 69,000 shootings resulting in death or requiring urgent medical care in California from 2016 to 2021. Around one in three of those shootings were accidental, she said. Many involved children.

Gun rights advocates said the bill would be challenged in court if it becomes law. 

Adam Wilson of Gun Owners of California called the proposed requirements “an insurmountable barrier to exercising a constitutional right.”

Clay Kimberling, a lobbyist for the National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action, said that’s especially true for the estimated 115,000 gun owners who move to California each year.

“Whether they move into the state on a new job, a new military assignment, or family obligations such as helping a sick or elderly family member, lawful firearm owners would now have to search out an instructor, pay for the class … and take eight hours out of their day … for simply wanting to continue to practice their constitutional right to keep and bear arms in a new state,” Kimberling said.

That original version of the bill also would have required new California arrivals to register firearms and take the course within 60 days. 

Will the bill make it to Newsom?

Under current law, Californians are required to pass a written test and pay $25 to obtain a five-year firearm safety certificate to purchase a gun, but no formal training course is required.

Licensed hunters are required to take a mandatory hunting-safety course and aren’t required to get a certificate when buying rifles or shotguns. Also exempt are those who’ve obtained a concealed weapons permit, which is issued after 16 hours of mandatory training that includes live-fire at a gun range.

Those exemptions would still apply.

For everyone else, the proposed four hours of training would include coursework on state and federal gun laws, secure firearm storage, safe handling, the dangers of guns, use-of-force laws, how to sell firearms legally and conflict resolution. The live-fire portion of the course would need to last at least an hour.

Second Amendment groups say paying a Department of Justice-certified firearms instructor would add at least $400 to the cost of buying a firearm. Applicants also would have to pay for ammunition, gun rentals and range fees. Fees and firearms taxes already can add more than $100 to the cost of a firearm in California. 

The training requirements would take effect July 1, 2028.

Until then, beginning on Jan. 1, gun owners moving to the state would be required to pass the current written test and register their firearms with the Department of Justice within 180 days.

Violating the proposed law would be a misdemeanor.

The bill now moves to the full Senate. It will then have to advance through the Assembly by this summer if Gov. Gavin Newsom is to sign it. He hasn’t taken a position on the legislation.

Last year, a bill with eight-hour training requirements died in the Assembly Appropriations Committee.

‘OnlyFans’ comment about high schoolers in Speedos ignites controversy

An Inland Empire high school water polo player’s mother...

Moving to California with a gun? You might have to take a four-hour course

In summary Want to buy a gun in California? Lawmakers...

California lawmakers rush $25 million to hospitals without knowing who qualifies

A $25 million grant to cash-strapped hospitals became law...