California’s new plastic recycling rules spark fights from all sides

Date:

California just gave plastic producers until 2032 to make all their packaging recyclable or compostable — the most ambitious deadline in the country. Advocates say it doesn’t go far enough. Producers say it goes too far. At least one of them is threatening to sue.

The sweeping regulations, finalized at the start of the month, put producers in a bind that has no obvious solution. Plastic clamshell containers, for instance, protect berries from being crushed and keep them fresher, longer until they reach a refrigerator. Plastic producers say there’s simply no substitute — yet under the new rules, they’ll have to find one. 

Last week, two environmental groups — the Natural Resources Defense Council and Californians Against Waste — said they plan to take California to court. Their argument: the state’s rules actually break the law by allowing recycling methods that create a lot of toxic waste, and by letting some plastics slip through the rules entirely. On the other side, plastic manufacturers say the rules go too far and will make products more expensive for shoppers.

Sen. Ben Allen, a Democrat from coastal Los Angeles County who authored the plastic waste law, said the program still “massively moves the needle on this really major problem” — even if the process was messy. “This was the product of a compromise, and it was not perfect, and everybody walked away from the table, you know, unhappy about various aspects,” Allen said.

“California is the United States, but 30 years in the future,” said Joe Árvai,  director of the University of Southern California’s Wrigley Institute for Environmental Studies. “What’s happening now is emblematic of trends that we are seeing worldwide … and the U.S. needs to adapt in the way that those countries are adapting in order to remain globally competitive.”

Less plastic, more recycling 

For decades, the burden of reducing, reusing and recycling plastic waste has fallen on consumers. Once a consumer buys a product, they decide what happens to it — whether it ends up in the garbage can or the recycling blue bin — and their tax dollars fund recycling systems we have today.  

In 2022, California’s landmark Senate Bill 54, the Plastic Pollution Prevention and Packaging Producer Responsibility Act, shifted that responsibility to businesses. The regulations outline what materials are covered by the law and who counts as a “producer” of plastic waste.  

The new regulations are a huge milestone, said Anja Brandon, director of U.S. plastics policy for the Ocean Conservancy. “There’s plenty more steps on this journey, but I’m just really excited that we are going to start making real progress,” she said. 

The law applies to plastic food service ware and almost all single-use packaging — from the plastic wrap around large pallets of products shipped to retailers to a tube of toothpaste and the cardboard box around it.  

To carry out the law, the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery appointed the Circular Action Alliance, a nonprofit that helps states carry out extended producer responsibility mandates, as the organizing body for producers. The alliance is responsible for coming up with  a plan to meet the law’s goals. 

Producers — defined as companies that make more than $1 million in sales and produce products packaged in plastic or own brands under which those products are sold — must join the organization and pay fees to fund waste management. They can meet the law’s requirements by using less plastic, finding alternative materials, or investing in recycling infrastructure.

“The biggest challenge is the scale and coordination required to modernize a complex recycling system across a state as large and diverse as California,” said Sheila Estaniel, a spokesperson for the Circular Action Alliance, in an email. 

California’s requirement that businesses reduce single-use plastic altogether makes it one of the strongest plastic waste laws in the country. It also goes further than other similar laws because it requires plastic producers to pay $5 billion over a decade to address the environmental damage their products have caused to communities — though the state doesn’t expect to start distributing those funds until 2027 at the earliest.

Watered down rules

The plastic waste rules have had a rocky road to implementation. 

In 2024, CalRecycle developed a first draft of regulations detailing what plastic the law covers and what producers must do. The draft expired before CalRecycle finalized it. In 2025, Gov. Gavin Newsom directed regulators to rewrite the rules — a move that some advocates say say food and agriculture lobbyists pushed for.

The result was a second draft that carved out a broad exclusion for plastics used for food and agriculture purposes, covering products under the jurisdiction of the FDA and USDA, such as packaging for fresh produce and supplements. Advocates said the exclusion gutted the law.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

Democrats Pledged Neutrality in California Race, Then Chose Sides

National Democrats are zeroing in on California’s 22nd Congressional...

Newsom’s unbalanced budget faces strong pushback for spending cuts. Will lawmakers back him?

Gov. Gavin Newsom’s proposed state budget is drawing mounting...

CA colleges try to improve online classes

A person wearing a blue shirt and glasses is working on a laptop at a kitchen table, with books and school materials scattered around, in the corner of a kitchen in a home. In the background, a framed painting hangs directly above the person as they work, while in the foreground is a view of a kitchen cabinet.
A person wearing a blue shirt and glasses is working on a laptop at a kitchen table, with books and school materials scattered around, in the corner of a kitchen in a home. In the background, a framed painting hangs directly above the person as they work, while in the foreground is a view of a kitchen cabinet.
Student Tina Rocha sorts through her classwork at her home in Stockton on May 7, 2026. Photo by Larry Valenzuela, CalMatters

Online college classes can be impersonal, isolating and disengaging. But with high demand among their students for online learning, California’s community colleges and universities are trying to find better online teaching practices.

As CalMatters’ Adam Echelman explains, about 40% of all community college classes are online. Online courses enable students, especially those who are part- or full-time workers, to complete their degree while juggling jobs, caretaking responsibilities or other obligations.

But taking these courses also requires “self-directed learning skills,” including a “very high level of self-time management,” said Di Xu, a professor at UC Irvine’s School of Education. 

  • Xu: “In an in-person environment interaction happens naturally. But in an online environment, especially asynchronous, that opportunity needs to be embedded. Otherwise, the student will feel very lonely.” 

Students prefer online courses, and they’re less costly for colleges to offer than in-person ones.

Rebecca Ruan-O’Shaughnessy, the director of program and strategy at College Futures Foundation and a former executive at the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office, said schools need to adapt. Some new approaches she cited as promising include shortening the length of classes or trying to integrate adults’ work experience since so many online students have jobs.

To address some of the shortcomings of online foreign language courses, Julia Simon, a professor of French at UC Davis and the chairperson of a task force on languages for the university, is considering creating a set of conversation classes.

Simon said students who take online courses miss out on opportunities to practice speaking. Once students enter UC Davis, they’re unprepared, she said. But since “we can’t make them repeat courses they’ve already had,” Simon said, a conversation class could be offered as remedial education to help students catch up.

Read more.


We’re bringing our voter guide to life through VotingMatters events across California this month, in collaboration with on-the-ground partners: Local news organizations, colleges and nonprofits. Our last event is this evening in Modesto. Plus, we have a DIY kit to host your own event.



Competition at the Board of Equalization

An outer view of a white and black semi-spherical dome that sits on top a white building decorated with various architectural details.
The state Capitol on March 28, 2025. Photo by Miguel Gutierrez Jr., CalMatters

We know that Californians are curious about elections at the Board of Equalization this year. Our page for that contest is drawing the second-largest audience in our voter guide, second only to the governor’s race.

That’s surprising considering the agency’s funny name and its fairly narrow portfolio in the world of California taxes. The agency had a lot more power until 2017, when then-Gov. Jerry Brown signed a law stripping it of almost all of its employees and authority.

  • Betty Yee, former state controller: “I just really do question how this board continues to have relevance.”

But we can also see that the races for the four board of equalization seats are going to be competitive. Three current lawmakers are running for open seats, and a former assemblymember is up for reelection.

  • State Sen. Tom Umberg, who is running for a seat on the board: “Although it’s not a high-profile job, it’s a critically important job, especially when we’ve got so many revenue challenges in California.”

Read more on the race here.

$25M needed to clean up polluting road

Water flows across a narrow rural road lined with dense trees and brush. A yellow road sign showing a horseback rider stands near the bend in the road, while sunlight filters through the foliage and reflects off the shallow water covering the pavement.
Flooding caused by the Tijuana River covers a section of Saturn Boulevard after a rainy day in San Diego on Nov. 21, 2025. Photo by Adriana Heldiz, CalMatters

The Tijuana River is severely polluted. When it rains, the river waters rise and flood part of Saturn Boulevard in San Diego. The part of the road the polluted waters flood exacerbates the already dire situation, spraying contaminants into the air. 

Fixing this particular situation — not solving the river’s pollution but curbing some of the negative health effects caused by the pollutants becoming airborne — would cost $25 million, reports CalMatters’ Deborah Brennan. The positive effects of the repair could be felt as soon as next year, according to San Diego County officials, but coming up with the cash will be a challenge. 

Lawmakers submitted a request in the state budget to cover $23 million, and its possible money from 2024’s $10 billion Proposition 4 could be drawn upon, as well as increasing the county sales tax. 

Read more.

And lastly: CA’s ICE ID requirement

A group of heavily armed federal agents in full tactical gear emerge from the back of an armored vehicle labeled “LENCO ARMORED VEHICLES” on a sunlit urban street. Most wear camouflage fatigues, body armor, helmets, and goggles, with visible patches reading “POLICE” and insignias from U.S. Border Patrol and Homeland Security. Some agents carry rifles and one has zip cuffs and canisters clipped to their vest. A media photographer in a press vest films nearby. Palm trees and a clear blue sky suggest a Southern California location.
Federal agents descend on MacArthur Park in Los Angeles on July 7, 2025. Photo by J.W. Hendricks for CalMatters

A federal appeals court blocked California from enforcing a law requiring masked federal agents to display identification during operations. CalMatters’ Nigel Duara and video strategy director Robert Meeks have a video segment on how the April ruling is a setback for the state’s effort to curb aggressive immigration enforcement tactics, as part of our partnership with PBS SoCal. Watch it here.

SoCalMatters airs at 5:58 p.m. weekdays on PBS SoCal.



Other things worth your time:

Some stories may require a subscription to read.


Record-setting outside money pouring into CA governor’s race // Los Angeles Times

Why Silicon Valley’s big bet on Mahan went bust // Politico

CA’s overseas voters face new barriers after Trump administration cut key program // San Francisco Chronicle

After raids, US citizens and immigrants seek millions for shootings, injuries, trauma // Los Angeles Times

CA Assemblymember Addis to protect student privacy through AB 1159 // Mustang News

The United Farm Workers built its political power around Chavez. Now it faces a reckoning // The Sacramento Bee

Bay Area braces for Trump’s tougher CalFresh rules // The Mercury News

Their meteoric rise reshaped the Bay Area and powered Silicon Valley. Is it at an end? // San Francisco Chronicle

Approximately 65% of evacuees for Garden Grove chemical threat can return home, officials say // The Orange County Register

Our house burned down but our mortgage didn’t. California fire survivors need time

When Rachel Jonas and Robert Fagnani planned their younger...